Profil

Most traditional societies have deeply entrenched commitments and connections between individuals, families, and groups. The very concept of society rests on the idea of networks of affinity and affection, and the freestanding individual exists largely as an outcast or exile. Mobile and individualistic modern societies shed some of these old ties and vacillate about taking on others, especially those expressed through economic arrangements-including provisions for the aged and vulnerable, the mitigation of poverty and desperation-the keeping of one's brothers and sisters. The argument against such keeping is often framed as an argument about human nature: we are essentially selfish, and because you will not care for me, I cannot care for you. I will not feed you because I must hoard against starvation, since I too cannot count on others. Better yet, I will take your wealth and add it to mine-if I believe that my well-being is independent of yours or pitted against yours-and justify my conduct as natural law. If I am not my brother's keeper, then we have been expelled from paradise, a paradise of unbroken solidarities.

— A Paradise Built in Hell de Rebecca Solnit

In the anti-roads movement, there was a twin strategy of what we called 'fluffy' disobedience in the daytime, blocking the bulldozers often with local residents support, and at night secretly sabotaging the machines, called "pixieing" after mischievous fairies. It worked: despite losing many key battles, the war was won, and 600 planned roads were canceled.

— We Are ‘Nature’ Defending Itself de Isabelle Fremeaux, Jay Jordan